Run it like a courthouse.

Land on the dashboard, open Cases, scan and sort the list, open one case.

Is this what a clerk needs to see first — the right columns, in the right order?

Add a party, add/adjust a charge, schedule a hearing, record a minute, assess an obligation and take a payment (watch the balance + the restitution→costs→fines allocation), post a bond.

Does one case page hold everything a clerk juggles, in the order you actually move a case? What's missing? What's noise?

Create a case, add the defendant via the Master Person Index, file the first charge, set a security level.

Is intake this simple in real life — or are there steps/fields/validations a real intake clerk needs?

As records, run a case through request→approve→execute sealing (note the separation-of-duties block). Then sign in as clerk and confirm the sealed case is masked.

Does the sealing workflow match your county's process and separation-of-duties rules?

Open Bench: assigned cases, today's docket, the proposed-order queue. Sign an order (guarded needs step-up); add a chambers note.

Is this what a judge wants in front of them in court — the right worklists and one-click actions?

Magistration (48h→PC→warnings→counsel→bond); Malta jail (booking→classification→housing→release); Sinopia pre-trial (assessment→recommendation→FTA); Andamento probation (conditions→chrono→violation); Tessera DA (referral→screening→charging→Brady/diversion/plea).

Which office feels closest to right, and which feels most wrong?

Use global search (access-filtered). Open several records (they stack as tabs). Find a person who appears in jail AND court AND probation and confirm it's one shared record.

Is 'one shared record across every office' actually delivered in a way a real county would feel?